Treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease (ROSET-BM).

Therapeutic options for breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM)/leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) are limited. Here, we report on the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer patients with BM. Data were analyzed for 104 patients administered T-DXd. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial (IC)-ORR, and IC-PFS were evaluated. ORR by investigator assessment was 55.7% (total population). Median PFS was 16.1 months; 12-month OS rate was 74.9% (total population). Median time-to-treatment failure was 9.7 months. In 51 patients with BM imaging, IC-ORR and median IC-PFS by independent central review were 62.7% and 16.1 months, respectively. In 19 LMC patients, 12-month PFS and OS rates were 60.7% and 87.1%, respectively. T-DXd showed effectiveness regarding IC-ORR, IC-PFS, PFS, and OS in breast cancer patients with BM/active BM, and sustained systemic and central nervous system disease control in LMC patients.Trial Registration: UMIN000044995.

Single-dose trastuzumab monotherapy achieved pathological complete response (pCR) in a patient with HER2-positive breast cancer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: With advances in breast cancer treatment, the importance of de-escalation therapy to reduce harm during the treatment of elderly patients has attracted attention in recent years. Certain patient populations are expected to have a superior response to anti-HER2 drugs, particularly those with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. In this report, we describe our experience of dramatic anti-HER2 drug response in a patient who achieved pathological complete response (pCR) with a single dose of trastuzumab. CASE PRESENTATION: An 88-year-old woman presented with a 2-cm palpable mass in the left breast. Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed estrogen receptor-negative and HER2-positive, T1N0M0, stage I breast cancer. Mastectomy was scheduled within 2 months of the initial visit; however, the patient was anxious about the length of the waiting period and requested medication in the interim. Therefore, prior to surgery, one cycle of trastuzumab monotherapy was administered at the discretion of the attending physician. Postoperative pathology showed no remnant of invasive carcinoma and pCR with only a 0.2-mm ductal carcinoma in situ remnant. The patient refused further medication after surgery because of severe diarrhea after trastuzumab administration. Postoperative treatment was limited to follow-up, and no recurrence was observed at 1 year and 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that trastuzumab monotherapy may be effective in certain patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. In the future, identifying patients who are more likely to respond to trastuzumab, as in this case, will allow for more options regarding de-escalation therapy without chemotherapy, particularly in elderly patients who are concerned about the side effects of chemotherapy.

Evaluation of the Role of Axillary Lymph Node Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Early Breast Cancer With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes (AxLNs) is performed to diagnose nodal metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Although the sensitivity of ultrasound-guided FNAC for identifying AxLN metastasis is in the range of 36%-99%, whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be performed for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) patients with negative FNAC results is uncertain. This study aimed to determine the role of FNAC before NAC in the evaluation and management of AxLN in early breast cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3,810 clinically node-negative (a lymph node with no clinical metastasis without FNAC or radiological suspicion of metastasis with negative FNAC results) patients with breast cancer who underwent SLNB between 2008 and 2019. We compared the positivity rate of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) between patients who received and those who did not receive NAC with negative FNAC results or without FNAC and axillary recurrence rate in the neoadjuvant group with negative SLNB results. RESULTS: In the non-neoadjuvant (primary surgery) group, the positivity rate of SLNs in patients with negative FNAC results was higher than that in patients without FNAC (33.2% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.001). However, the SLN positivity rate of patients with negative FNAC results (false-negative rate for FNAC) in the neoadjuvant group was lower than that in the primary surgery group (3.0% vs. 33.2%; p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 3 years, one axillary nodal recurrence was observed, which was a case from the neoadjuvant non-FNAC group. None of the patients in the neoadjuvant group with negative FNAC results had axillary recurrence. CONCLUSION: The false-negative rate for FNAC in the primary surgery group was high; however, SLNB was the proper axillary staging procedure for NAC patients who have clinically suspicious AxLN metastases on radiologic examination but negative FNAC results.

The Absence of Cancer in the Location of a Breast Tissue Marker After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy may Predict Pathological Complete Response with High Accuracy: Results from a Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to determine pathological complete response (pCR) before surgery in clinical complete response (cCR) cases by imaging alone. We designed a prospective study to evaluate whether a breast tissue marker placed in a tumor before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can predict a pCR, possibly removing the need for surgery. METHODS: We recruited patients with primary invasive breast cancer assigned to undergo curative surgery and possible NAC. A breast marker (UltraClip®) was placed in the primary tumor before standard NAC. We evaluated the probability of no cancer in the marker but cancer in removed specimens from a cCR group. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were enrolled. Patients were categorized by cancer stage and subtypes. Seventy-two patients (70.6%) received standard NAC; 23 (34.3%) attained cCR, of whom pCR was obtained in 12 (52.2%). The probability of no cancer in the marker's location but cancer in the removed specimens was 4.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.1-21.9). The false-negative rate was 9.1% (1/11), and the negative predictive value was 92.3% (12/13). In only one case, no cancer was found in the marker's location, but cancer cells were present in the removed specimen. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of cancer in the location of a breast tissue marker after NAC predicted pCR with high accuracy. Therefore, the rebiopsy of a marker's location might mean surgery is unnecessary.

Arthralgia induced by endocrine therapy with or without cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have been approved for breast cancer (BC) treatment. Several trials suggested that arthralgia was reduced in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i compared with that in those with ET-alone. We aimed to compare arthralgia rates in BC patients treated with/without CDK4/6i. We reviewed randomized controlled phase II/III trials investigating CDK4/6i with ET in hormone receptor-positive and epidermal growth factor 2-negative BC. Publications were retrieved from PubMed from January 2014 to April 2021. We compared arthralgia rates between patients who were administered ET plus CDK4/6i (CDK4/6i group) and those treated with ET-alone (control group). We reviewed 12 trials that reported data on adverse effects for arthralgia. These trials included 17,440 patients (9255 in the CDK4/6i group and 8185 in the control group). The arthralgia rate in the CDK4/6i group was significantly lower than that in the control group (27.6% vs. 34.8%, p < .001), especially in early BC (28.8% vs. 37.3%, p < .001). These suggested that the arthralgia rate in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i was lower than that in patients treated with ET-alone and that CDK4/6i may decrease the arthralgia rate in BC patients treated with ET, especially in early BC.

Satisfaction survey on a preoperative explanation method using three-dimensional breast imaging for breast cancer patients considering breast-conserving surgery.

PURPOSE: Although one of the essential factors in surgical shared decision-making is the body image, the breast morphology after breast-conserving surgery is particularly difficult to explain in a uniform manner due to large individual differences. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer eligible for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were recruited between June 2020 and October 2021. We surveyed the patients' satisfaction with our method of explaining the likely breast morphology after BCS using three-dimensional (3D) breast imaging in the form of a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were enrolled, and 137 (84.6%) answered the questionnaire. One hundred and sixteen patients (84.6%) answered that they were very satisfied or satisfied with our explanation method, and 100 (73.0%) patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the 3D breast imaging. Some patients answered that 3D breast imaging helped them prepare for BCS, or on the contrary, made them choose mastectomy with breast reconstruction because the deformation likely with BCS was considered unacceptable. Only a few patients who underwent BCS felt that their postoperative morphology was more deformed than the preoperatively imagined one. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that our preoperative explanation method using 3D breast imaging was useful for shared decision-making.

Time to Chemotherapy for Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitor Use.

PURPOSE: Safely postponing the use of chemotherapy is important for quality of life maintenance in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. In previous studies, a combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and fulvestrant prolonged the time to chemotherapy (TTC). In this study, we used real-world data to evaluate TTC in the context of CDK4/6i therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer treated at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were categorized into having received CDK4/6i therapy first (n = 41), second (n = 33), and none at all (n = 67). The change in TTC among the groups was examined. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 13.8, 27.5, and 30.3 months in the CDK4/6i (first), CDK4/6i (second), and non-CDK4/6i groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy for metastasis was 30.0, 11.9, and 13.0 months, respectively (CDK4/6i [first] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.018, CDK4/6i [second] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.383). The median TTC was not reached in the CDK4/6i (first) group, was 39.1 months in the CDK4/6i (second) group, and was 44.2 months in the non-CDK4/6i group (CDK4/6i [first] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.880; CDK4/6i [second] vs. non-CDK4/6i; p = 0.407). The non-CDK4/6i group with TTC ≥ 60 months included more cases of secondary endocrine therapy resistance (p = 0.017), no perioperative chemotherapy (p = 0.021), and a longer disease-free interval (p = 0.093). CONCLUSION: Although PFS was significantly longer in the CDK4/6i (first) group than in the non-CDK4/6i group, TTC did not significantly differ among the three groups in real-world data. The non-CDK4/6i group showed a long TTC in patients with late recurrence and low risk at the primary lesion site, who benefited greatly from hormone monotherapy.

Impact of Tumor Progression on Survival During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Few patients with breast cancer experience tumor progression during neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), but their poor outcome is similar to that of patients who fail to achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). No previous reports have compared patients with pCR, non-pCR, and progression during NST to determine the survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective chart review of patients with stage I-III breast cancer was conducted between January 2001 and December 2018. pCR was defined as no invasive cancer or in situ residuals in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: Of the 595 patients who received NST, 167 (28.1%) had pCR (pCR group), 404 (67.9%) did not attain pCR (non-pCR group), and 24 (4.0%) experienced tumor progression during NST (PD group). The median DFS was 6.0 months, 154.0 months, and not reached in the PD, non-pCR, and pCR groups, respectively. The PD group had significantly shorter DFS than patients without tumor progression in the pCR and non-pCR groups [hazard ratio (HR)=13.0, 95%CI=8.1-21.0, p<0.01]. The median OS was 13.6 months (95%CI=10.4-35.5) in the PD group and was not reached in the pCR and non-pCR (non-PD) groups. The OS was significantly poorer in the PD group than in the non-PD groups (HR=15.8, 95%CI=9.2-27.1, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The PD group had the poorest survival outcome even after recurrence, thus warranting new treatment strategies.

Association between bevacizumab with cancer drug therapies and drug-induced interstitial lung disease in patients with solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine interstitial lung disease (ILD) incidences in patients receiving cancer drug therapies with or without bevacizumab treatment. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were conducted in January 2021. The main inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials that compared bevacizumab with standard treatment in patients with solid tumors. Cochrane Collaboration's Tool was used for assessing risk-of-bias. RESULTS: Thirteen records involving 7201 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were 42 ILD events in bevacizumab groups and 72 in control groups. In bevacizumab groups, the odds ratio for ILD was 0.62 (95% CI 0.42-0.92; p = 0.02), which was a significantly lower incidence than the control. This tendency was shown in targeted therapy groups but not in the cytotoxic agent groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that bevacizumab may reduce the incidence of ILD.

The frequency of low HER2 expression in breast cancer and a comparison of prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-negative breast cancer by HR status.

PURPOSE: The DESTINY-Breast04 clinical trial is currently investigating whether trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is effective in HER2-low as well as HER2-positive breast cancer. This highlights the interest in treatment strategies for patients with HER2-low breast cancer. The current study was therefore designed to determine the frequency of HER2-low among all breast cancers, and to compare the prognosis of HER2-low patients with that of HER2-negative patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the biological data from 4,918 of 4,977 primary breast cancer patients who attended our institute. We quantified the overall frequency of breast cancer patients with a new HER2-low subtype that was defined by an immunohistochemistry score of IHC1 + or IHC2 + /ISH-. We then compared the clinical characteristics and prognosis of HER2-low patients with that of patients who did not have HER2 amplification (HER2-0). RESULTS: Low HER2 expression was found in 3169 (64.4%) patients; 2860 (58.1%) were HR-positive and 309 (6.3%) were HR-negative. Among HER2-0 patients, 681 (13.9%) were HR-positive and 157 (3.2%) were HR-negative. The HER2-0 group tended to have more poor prognostic factors than the HER2-low group, irrespective of HR status. There were no statistically significant differences between the prognosis of HER2-low and HER2-0 patients, regardless of HR status. However, patients in the HER2-low group tended to have better prognosis than those in the HER2-0 group. CONCLUSION: HER2-low patients did not have a significantly different prognosis than HER2-0 patients, regardless of HR status. However, we should consider tailoring therapies for patients with HRE2-low early breast cancer according to their HR status.

Differences in baseline risk estimated by physicians and patients with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Physicians recommend adjuvant therapy to patients based on baseline risk. A common recognition for baseline risk between patients and physicians is critical for successful adjuvant therapy. We prospectively investigated the differences in estimated baseline risk between physicians and patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: This analysis was performed at a single institution in Japan. Early breast cancer patients over 18 years old were enrolled after surgery. After explaining the pathological results, physicians asked each patient about an estimated baseline risk. Differences in estimated baseline risk were defined as the baseline risk estimated by patients minus the baseline risk estimated by physicians. The primary endpoint was that the number of patients who estimate baseline risk higher than physicians was higher than those who estimate a lower baseline risk. The secondary endpoints were differences in estimated baseline risk by stage, subtype and the influence of patient factors to differences in estimated baseline risk. RESULTS: From July 2017 to December 2018, 262 patients were enrolled. Among the 262 patients, 190 estimated a higher baseline risk than physicians, 53 estimated a lower baseline risk and 19 estimated the same. Overall, patients estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians (P < 0.001). Differences in estimated baseline risk was significantly smaller in patients who knew the term 'baseline risk' than patients who did not (P = 0.0037). Differences in estimated baseline risk were also significantly smaller in patients with stage II breast cancer than patients with stage I (P = 0.0239). However, there were no statistically significant differences of differences in estimated baseline risk according to other factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early breast cancer estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians. Physicians should accurately explain baseline risk to patients for shared decision making.

The significance of biopsy scar excision at the time of skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Neoplastic seeding (NS) can occur after tissue biopsy, which is a clinical issue especially in mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. This is because postoperative radiation is not usually given and local recurrence of preserved skin flap may increase. The purpose of this study is to investigate the importance of preoperative evaluation of NS and the validity of biopsy scar excision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 174 cases of mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. The primary endpoint is the frequency of clinical and pathological NS and the secondary endpoint is the problem of excision of needle biopsy site. RESULTS: Three cases (1.7%) had preoperative clinical findings of NS. Pathological examination revealed NS in all three cases. Biopsy scars could be excised in 115 cases among 171 cases without clinical NS. Pathological NS was found in 1 of 66 (1.5%) cases of which pathological examination was performed. Biopsy scars could not be excised in the remaining 56 cases: the biopsy scar could not be identified in 41 cases, and there was concern about a decrease in flap blood flow after excision in 15 cases. In 12 of these 15 cases, the scars were close to the skin incision; excision of these scars might have triggered skin necrosis between the incision and the biopsy scar excision site. No postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to preoperatively evaluate clinical NS, and biopsy scars should be excised in clinical NS cases. Even in cases without clinical NS, biopsy scar excision should be considered. It is also important to perform a biopsy in consideration of the incision design for reconstructive surgery.

Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on prognosis in small hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has been previously established. However, significant adverse events related to endocrine therapy cannot be ignored. T1 breast cancer is expected to have a good prognosis. Therefore, adjuvant endocrine therapy for T1a breast cancer patients is controversial. Thus, in this study, we examined the effect of endocrine therapy on the prognosis of T1N0 hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients in each tumor size group, and re-considered the application of endocrine therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively obtained clinical and pathological data from medical records of 7635 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer at Aichi Cancer Hospital between January 2000 and December 2017. The primary end point of our analysis was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end points were distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). The log-rank test, cumulative survival generated curves with Kaplan-Meier methods and the hazard ratio (HR) calculated with a Cox regression model were used to assess the effects of endocrine therapy on prognosis. RESULTS: The 5-year DFS was worse in the non-endocrine therapy (non-ET) group (78%) than the endocrine therapy (ET) group (95%) in the T1c population (p < 0.001, HR 0.25). However, there was no statistically significant difference in DFS between the ET and the non-ET groups in T1a (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.9314, HR 0.94) and T1b (ET 96% vs non-ET 93%, p = 0.1481HR 0.53) breast cancer. The OS, DDFS, and BCSS of the patients also showed that endocrine therapy was associated with improvement of the prognosis in the T1c group, but not in the T1a and T1b groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant endocrine therapy may be essential for T1c breast cancer patients. In contrast, this therapy should be discussed for T1a and T1b luminal breast cancer patients under some circumstances, such as suffering from adverse events.

Mechanisms and anatomical risk factors of pneumothorax after Bevacizumab use: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic agent, and that synergizes with chemotherapeutic drugs. When used in combination therapies, Bevacizumab is associated with adverse events such as hemorrhage, gastrointestinal perforation, delayed wound healing, and pneumothorax. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these adverse events are not fully understood. CASE SUMMARY: A 45-year-old female with multiple lung metastases that were derived from primary breast cancer, was placed on Bevacizumab + paclitaxel therapy, since this combination has a potent antitumor effect. She reported dyspnea before cycle 3, day 1 and we therefore ran a chest X-ray, which detected a right pneumothorax. The coronal plane computed tomography revealed that one solid mass rapidly necrosed and was replaced by a cavity that passed through the bronchus in the right lower lobe. The cavity eventually ruptured the pleura and made the bronchopleural fistula that led to this pneumothorax. Thoracic cavity drainage using an intercostal catheter was performed. On the 7th day of drainage, the patient was discharged from our hospital on recovery. Recurrence of pneumothorax was not reported, and continuation of chemotherapy was made possible by changing the regimen. CONCLUSION: Patients with lung metastases surrounding the bronchi and on the pleura should be monitored for pneumothorax by Bevacizumab-containing chemotherapies.

Utility of regional nodal irradiation in Japanese patients with breast cancer with 1-3 positive nodes after breast-conserving surgery and axillary lymph-node dissection.

The utility of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is being considered in cases of 1-3 axillary node metastases after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND). Therefore, we examined the necessity of RNI by examining the sites of recurrences in cases at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed 5,164 cases of primary breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2014 at the Aichi Cancer Centre, identifying local and distant recurrences in 152 patients with primary breast cancer treated with BCS and ALND and who had 1-3 positive axillary nodes. All patients received whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and adjuvant systemic therapy with either chemotherapy or anti-endocrine therapy with or without anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy. The present study excluded patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, T4 tumors or N2-3 nodes and distant metastasis. From the database of our institution, we identified 152 cases that met the defined criteria. The median follow-up period was 71 months (1-176). Isolated locoregional recurrences were found in three patients (2.0%) and were recurrent only in the breast. Only one patient had local lymph node recurrence with distant recurrence. The 10-year rates of isolated regional disease-free survival (DFS), DFS, and overall survival were 95.41, 89.50 and 96.75%, respectively, which was better compared with previous studies. We conclude that the addition of RNI to WBI is not necessary for Japanese patients who have 1-3 positive axillary nodes and ALND.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on operative adverse events and chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has been become a standard treatment for patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. However, whether IBR is appropriate in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is still unclear. Therefore, in this study we examined the rates of operative adverse events (AEs), risk factors for operative AEs, and effects on chemotherapy and radiotherapy of IBR with NAC. METHODS: Between January 2012 and March 2018, 593 patients underwent IBR at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. We retrospectively obtained clinical data of all these patients from their medical records and identified 56 patients (65 breasts) who had received NAC (NAC group) and 537 patients (568 breasts) who had not (non-NAC group). We compared the rates of operative AEs, risk factors for operative AEs, chemotherapy-related AEs, and duration to radiotherapy between the NAC and non-NAC cohorts. RESULTS: The rate of operative AEs was significantly higher in the NAC than the non-NAC group (35% vs. 22%, p < 0.05). However, axillary lymph node dissection was the most influential risk factor, and NAC was not identified as a risk factor for operative AEs in patients who had undergone IBR. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in chemotherapy-related AEs or interval between surgery and postoperative radiotherapy between the NAC and non-NAC groups. CONCLUSIONS: NAC remains likely to contribute to increased postoperative AEs in patients undergoing IBR; however, it does not affect postoperative treatment and IBR is appropriate for patients undergoing NAC.

Impact of BMI for clinical outcomes in Japanese breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between the body mass index (BMI) at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and the prognosis of breast cancer patients has not yet been clarified. We investigated the impact of obesity for clinical outcomes in Japanese breast cancer patients. METHODS: Women with primary breast cancer operated between 2002 and 2014 were identified. All patients are categorized into four groups according to BMI. The range of BMI is <18.5 kg/m2, from 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2, >30 kg/m2 in underweight, normal, overweight and obesity groups, respectively. The correlation between BMI and overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: From the database of our institution, we identified 3223 patients. The median follow-up period was 57 months (1-149). We categorized 2257 (70.0%), 318 (9.9%), 545 (16.9%) and 103 (3.2%) patients into normal, underweight, overweight obesity groups respectively. There were189 patients (5.9%) deaths due to breast cancer recurrence (137 patients) and other disease (52 patients). Obesity groups was significantly high compared with normal groups for OS (adjusted HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.38-4.28; P < 0.001), BCSS (adjusted HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.15-6.44; P = 0.02) and DFS (adjusted HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.11-3.02; P = 0.017) by multivariate analysis. Especially, OS (adjusted HR, 4.87; 95% CI, 2.15-11.04; P < 0.001), BCSS (adjusted HR, 4.51; 95% CI, 1.52-13.34; P < 0.001) and DFS (adjusted HR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.02-4.89; P = 0.04) were statistically insignificant in postmenopausal ER-positive breast cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Obesity might be risk factor for OS, BCSS and DFS, especially postmenopausal ER-positive women.

Patient-reported outcomes and objective assessments with arm measurement and bioimpedance analysis for lymphedema among breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Lymphedema (LE) decreases the quality of life of breast cancer patients. Objective quantification of PRO may improve the discordance between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and objective assessments of LE by establishing a standard follow-up for LE. This study determined the prevalence of subjective and objective LE and evaluated the correlation between objective assessment and PRO of LE in primary breast cancer patients undergoing breast and axilla surgery. METHODS: Breast cancer patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SN) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) more than 1 year after surgery were enrolled. We prospectively evaluated LE using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) and two objective assessments (arm circumference and bioimpedance) and analyzed their correlations. RESULTS: Between November 2018 and January 2019, 631 patients (SN; n = 415, ALND; n = 216) were enrolled. The median age, body mass index, and duration from surgery was 56 years, 21.9 kg/m2, and 3.8 years, respectively. The prevalences of subjective and objective LE were 4.1% and 1.4% in the SN group and 51.8% and 24.1% in the ALND group, respectively. The objective assessments were weakly positively correlated with PRO-CTCAE. Arm circumference measurement correlated better than bioimpedance overall and was most strongly correlated with "frequency" (r = 0.485, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LE occurred in few SN patients. The prevalence of subjective LE was higher than that of objective LE. Arm circumference measurements better reflected PRO than did bioimpedance. These results underscore the limitation of LE detection by subjective or objective methods alone.

A case of giant cell tumor of the breast, clinically suspected as malignant breast tumor.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the breast is scarce. We report a case of GCT of the breast which was suspected as a malignant breast tumor. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman noticed a tender lump in her right breast. We suspected a malignant tumor spreading widely with axillary lymph node metastasis on clinical examination and imaging. Histological evaluation of the biopsy tissue revealed a tumor composed the proliferation of oval to spindle-shaped cells and multinucleated giant cells without malignant epithelial cells. The tumor cells stained positively for CD68 and negatively for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. The pathological findings suggested GCT, and fine needle aspiration biopsy for the axillary lymph node was negative. However, there was a gap between the clinical presentation, such as a tender mass suggesting rapid growth and multiple lymphadenopathies, and the pathological presentation of biopsy, which made us hesitate to conclude GCT as the final preoperative diagnosis. We could not rule out the possibility of malignant tumors with OGCs before surgery. We performed mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy according to a surgical procedure for node-negative breast cancer with a wide ductal spread. The resected tissue histologically showed the same findings to the biopsy tissue. The definitive diagnosis of GCT of the breast was given, because the tumor lacked epithelial components, marked cellular atypia, and pleomorphism. CONCLUSIONS: GCT of the breast occasionally pretends as breast malignant tumors. Complete tumor resection should be performed for local control and the definitive diagnosis.